Search for: "Holding v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 69,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Conventional wisdom holds that this is also true within the government’s third branch, with the liberal justices of the United States Supreme Court championing the work of the press while their conservative colleagues threaten to erode its protections. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
’s (Tapestry) proposed $8.5 billion acquisition of Capri Holdings Limited (Capri), which, if consummated, would bring the Coach, Kate Spade and Michael Kors handbag brands together under the same holding company. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am by Jeff Welty
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962) (holding that a state may not criminalize the status of being a drug addict), and conduct, which generally may be punished. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Such objects often hold significance for communities, serving as symbols of their heritage. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]