Search for: "Hopes v. Davis" Results 441 - 460 of 722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 1:47 am by INFORRM
It also published many daybills, summarizing the previous day’s events, hoping to lure people to buy the paper. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm by Kim Zetter
The exception comes from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm by INFORRM
  But what about, say, the Blogger platform considered in Tamiz v Google and Davison v Habeeb? [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  Defendant and his family hoped that by retaining counsel, they could avoid further contact with law enforcement and limit press coverage of them. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by Lovechilde
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm by Alfred Brophy
 I think this is a very helpful contribution -- and I hope that in the future popular constitutionalism scholarship will also talk about the ways that public constitutional arguments (or constitutional culture) shape all sorts of responses, not just vetoes. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 The New Republic also has a  review of Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations (Viking), which Jacob Soll describes as a "colossal wreck of a book. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:21 pm by Edward Hartnett
  Moreover, there is precedent supporting that approach: the Helvering v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm by Rick Hasen
  I had hoped to be on, but I had a teaching conflict. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
 The less aggressive redistricting plans adopted this cycle show that even strong partisans have absorbed the lesson that if you create a bunch of 53 percent districts you can lose them when your side’s support goes down by 4 or 5 percent.Justice O'Connor said it best in the original political gerrymandering case, Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:43 pm by Orin Kerr
Under the latest good-faith exception case, Davis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]