Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 441 - 460
of 507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 1:24 am
In $2.9 Million 'Blast Fax' Settlement, Plaintiffs Get Coupons and Lawyers Get Cash
Fulton County Daily Report
Business service and supply giant Pitney Bowes has agreed to settle a "blast fax" class action by giving $26 coupons to plaintiffs for each week they received an unwanted fax -- and $950,000 to the lawyers for the class. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
Unfortunately, it's probably not worth Hizook's time or energy to sue over it -- which is why some creative Silicon Valley lawyers should be thinking about initiating a class action. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:37 am
But I never expected that the first class action coverage lawsuit would be based on homeowners’ coverage. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:14 am
The definition of "claim" in the FCA has been expanded to include these indirect claims, so long as the funds involved are used on behalf of the government or in furtherance of a government program or interest. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:14 am
The definition of "claim" in the FCA has been expanded to include these indirect claims, so long as the funds involved are used on behalf of the government or in furtherance of a government program or interest. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
The definition of "claim" in the FCA has been expanded to include these indirect claims, so long as the funds involved are used on behalf of the government or in furtherance of a government program or interest. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:52 pm
The definition of "claim" in the FCA has been expanded to include these indirect claims, so long as the funds involved are used on behalf of the government or in furtherance of a government program or interest. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
– no ECJ referrals on trade mark cases (Class 46) Depreciation for registered trade marks only (Class 46) (IP finance) Krakow City seeks protection for Hejnał Mariacki as sound trade mark (Class 46) Are the shoemaker’s children always ill-shod? [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:34 pm
We handle both individual consumer protection lawsuits and consumer class actions on behalf of clients throughout Illinois, as well as in partnership with firms in other states. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
The Court of Appeal held that California law does not distinguish between “direct” and “indirect” table service, see id., at 3-5, and that the case relied on by plaintiff, Leighton v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:05 am
A stinging recommendation called for limits on third-party data that could be used by the plaintiffs' experts to bolster efforts to certify a class of indirect purchasers of static random access memory. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
Defense attorneys moved to dismiss the class action, id., at 6; primarily Qualcomm argued that plaintiff lacked status to pursue the antitrust claims in the class action complaint, see, e.g., id., at 7-8. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:53 am
The direct purchasers sought to certify a national class, and after concluding that plaintiffs’ expert’s opinion was admissible and supported plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
There are other differences that Plaintiff has not included in this list including, the direct and indirect benefit elements of unjust enrichment. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
" Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff "could not have been actually deceived or damaged by any misrepresentation or concealment by the defendants. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 3:20 pm
Plaintiffs were businesses who sought to represent a class of businesses that lost money when the Interstate was shut down to address the blowout. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
The study found that CAFA may have failed to relocate any category of class actions to the federal courts; however, CAFA may have had an indirect effect on class action litigation by encouraging plaintiffs who file contract class actions to allege more claims based on federal law. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
The courthouse door in North Carolina is now wide open to antitrust plaintiffs making indirect purchaser claims, after the Court of Appeals' decision this week in Teague v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 12:37 pm
On remand, the appeals court pointed out that the drug makers in this case are accused of indirect deception -- that is, deception of a decision-maker that the plaintiff trusted, her doctor -- and deception by silence or concealment. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IPKat) Benoit Battistelli, director general of France’s INPI, appointed as next chair of EPO Administrative Council (Managing Intellectual Property) European patent trolls feel the heat: Nokia reports IP.com to the European Commission (IAM) Agricultural product quality: MARQUES speaks out (Class 46) European Patent Office to replace corrupt US assignment data (Daily Dose of IP) Finland Helsinki Court of Appeal denies Akun Tehdas Oy’s appeal and maintains… [read post]
