Search for: "Idaho v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Idaho 17-1026 Issue: Whether the “presumption of prejudice” recognized in Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:47 am by Amy Howe
” The CWA defines “navigable waters” as “the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas”; swamps, bogs, and marshes can all be regarded as “wetlands. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by James Yang
Tension between Trade Secret and California’s Section 16600 Most states in the United States have adopted some form of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act which protects information considered to be valuable due to its secrecy. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:03 pm by Amy Howe
EPA (Oct. 3): Whether the 9th Circuit used the proper test to determine whether wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm by Jeff Welty
Idaho: “Whether the ‘presumption of prejudice’ recognized in Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
In Moyle, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
Idaho, 17-1026 Issue: Whether the “presumption of prejudice” recognized in Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
This morning, January 16th, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Mead Corp. v. [read post]