Search for: "In Matter of Crouch"
Results 441 - 460
of 869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
by Dennis Crouch Look for opinions in Halo/Stryker and Cuozzo by the end June 2016. [read post]
30 May 2016, 7:34 pm
by Dennis Crouch Many aspects of trade-secret & non-compete law do not apply cleanly when a lawyer leaves the firm. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:24 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Enfish case is important in the way that it gives teeth to step-one of the Alice/Mayo test for subject matter eligibility. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:12 am
The effect of these cases on the resulting law is a different matter. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:51 pm
What would abandoning defensive-crouch liberalism mean? [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:56 pm
But it still is something that matters. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:15 am
My own list is Bakke (for rejecting all the rationales for affirmative action that really matter), Buckley v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
by Dennis Crouch Laches: The Supreme Court granted SCA’s writ of certiorari on the question of whether laches defense applies to block back-damages in patent cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm
By Dennis Crouch With today’s 410-2 House vote, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) has now passed both the House and Senate and is headed to President Obama for his expected signature.[1] The DTSA amends the Economic Espionage Act to create a private civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation based upon the Congressional sense that trade secret theft exists and is harmful.[2] Trade secret misappropriation (as a civil matter) has previously been… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Cuozzo: Prof Mann provides his preview of the April 25 oral arguments in Cuozzo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 10:38 am
In the initial proceeding the original claims were adjudicated only on the ground of subject matter eligibility under section 101. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
By Dennis Crouch Chicago Board of Options Exchange v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
by Dennis Crouch President Obama has announced his nomination of Merrick Garland to become the next Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2016).From SSRN (Non-U.S Law):Christa Rautenbach, The South African Constitutional Court's Use of Foreign Precedent in Matters of Religion: Without Fear or Favour? [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:05 pm
No matter what kind you use, position them carefully. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
At Patently-O, Professor Dennis Crouch, in a post titled “US Patent Applicants Heading to the EPO,” notes that many practitioners believe that the EPO is less restrictive in its application of patent eligible subject matter than the USPTO. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Queens University (Fed. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
