Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2"
Results 441 - 460
of 570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 10:43 am
In re Mortgage & Realty Trust, 195 B.R. 740, 750 (Bankr. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 8:42 am
Dist. #7, 98 B.R. 970 (Bankr. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
” In re Laskin, 222 B.R. 872 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Dow Corning Corp., 250 B.R. 298, 362-63 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 11:19 am
” In re Maxxim Medical Group, Inc., 434 B.R. 660, 693 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 9:39 am
Unfortunately for those of us in the 9th circuit (applicable to Washington state filers), there is a case called In Re Reswick, 446 B.R. 362, 371–72 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011), which found that Congress intended that the automatic stay to terminate as to all property despite how the bankruptcy code was written. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:41 am
If you're from out of state, then 1) envy our weather and 2) look up your own median income figures.] [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:48 am
” In re Davis, 403 B.R. 914, 920 (Fla. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 11:52 am
See In re Wheeler, 444 B.R. 598, 608 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:59 am
In re SPhinX, Ltd., 351 B.R. 103, 117 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
See In re Tomlin, 266 B.R. 350, 354 (N.D.Tex.2001). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
P. 8(a)(2) (applicable by Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
CLICK FOR FULL ARTICLE My 2 cents: As a general rule we have little sympathy for debt collectors who conduct abusive collection activities. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
In re Johannsen, 160 B.R. 328 (Bkrtcy. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:25 pm
The answer is no because of In re Washington, 602 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019), which was argued by our own Jenny L. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:42 pm
The code itself doesn't do a good job of defining when an operating agreement is an "executory contract", but in In re Ehmann, 319 B.R. 200 (D.Ariz. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
See, e.g., In re Asia Global Crossing Ltd., 322 B.R. 247, 255 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
” In re Sawyers, 2 F.4th 1133, 1137 (8th Cir. 2021) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
