Search for: "In Re: FDIC"
Results 441 - 460
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 7:29 pm
Plus, the widespread commercial real estate woes are not the result of speculative lending practices and dysfunctional loan structuring, they're the result of the general economic meltdown that followed the subprime mortgage debacle. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:57 am
Even if you’re completely cynical, you can say that at least this makes it harder for them to blame each other and/or claim ignorance when the next disaster happens. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
On the evening of Friday, March 12, 2010, the NYSBD seized The Park Avenue Bank and appointed the FDIC as receiver; FDIC has arranged for the sale of The Park Avenue Bank. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am
People will quickly realize that they might be much better off simply putting their money in a bank or splitting it among several or many banks, at lower rates of return but with assurance that the FDIC will pay them up to $250,000 for each separate account if a bank should prove fraudulent and bankrupt so that the money the depositors thought was in their accounts was not there in fact. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm
In December 2009, Congress re-visited the idea of allowing Bankruptcy Judges to reduce the principal balance owed on first mortgages on a borrower's residence. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:30 pm
It’s also a sad fact of life in 2010 that politicians who want to do the right thing may have to be given the “cover” of bending to constituent pressure if they are to survive sniping from within their own ranks that they’re “helping” members of the opposition in an election year. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm
How about we see if maybe instead of kicking the can down the road solely for residential loan borrowers, we try to save a few of the banks the FDIC is supposed to be watching out for and, perhaps, save some jobs while we're at it. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:36 pm
Sooner or later, no matter how observant or skilled you might be, you're going down. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:15 am
DOVERUnpublishedhttp://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0138n-06.pdfThe Court denied the Defendant’s appeal of summary judgment granted in favor of the USA and FDIC on an issue of res judicata. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
" You don't "gotta do" what you're doing, Sheila, anymore than the FDIC "had to" pioneer the Southwest Plan model of failed bank resolutions with the Dime Savings Bank resolution, when Stewart Root was with the FDIC. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:40 pm
They don’t sell to a private investor and they’re criticized by folks like Bonderman (and other private equity heavyweights) for taking a heavier loss than they otherwise would have had to have taken. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:40 am
" Both sides rely on a case called In re New Times Sec. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 7:34 pm
Even when they're won by a bank in the process of liquidating, which would have made a "victory" by the FDIC essentially useless, other than to feed a playground bully's apparently limitless need to prove that she's in charge. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:32 am
One of my favorite teaching cases is FDIC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:48 am
Among other things, the 35 questions and sample regulatory text suggest that the following standards might be included in a future rule: Limitations on permissible capital structures (e.g., limits on external credit support, leveraged tranches, re-securitizations, and other such features). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:25 pm
Nevertheless, they're going to get it. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:24 pm
Therefore, I'm going to re-post it tonight. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
It certainly rings true to those of us who've been through the massive loan participation workout wars of the 1980s, but we're smart enough to know that when the FDIC puts whatever assumptions it wants to put into "its little black box" that spits out cost calculations (as I once heard a former Federal Home Loan Bank Board general counsel describe it), the "costs" of any course of action the FDIC decides to take will turn out to be--Voila! [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 7:14 pm
Yes, we know that we're proposing kicking the can down the road, just like we're already doing on the residential mortgage side (albeit we're doing it poorly). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
The reason for the rescues during the crisis, such as AIG, or the TARP injections to forestall failures, was not to protect depositors of banks or the FDIC insurance fund. [read post]
