Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S." Results 441 - 460 of 762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But you really should start now in the hope that we might be able to get rid of British rule, if we’re lucky, by, say, 1825, which is only fifty years from now”? [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” On Facebook, he notes, people “tell you what car they drive, their mother’s name, their wife’s maiden name, children’s name, where they’re going on vacation, where they’ve been on vacation. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am by David Post
The parties had stipulated to certain facts, and the Court adopted those: Ms. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 am by Russ Bensing
  Several states and localities have adopted a requirement that such interrogations be audiotaped or videotaped; there’s presently a proposal in the Ohio legislature to adopt that rule for “major” felony cases. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 2:33 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
So my first inspiration is to point to a number of recent episodes that Steven poor from sigh farce Pioneers and Pathfinders podcast, which has a number of our friends of ours on it, such as Bob Ambrogi, Ed Walters, and Colin Levy. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
The draft EU Directive for trade secret protection is currently making its way through the legislative process with no firm timeline for adoption. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  In addition, the adopted budget agreement puts us on a path toward fiscal responsibility by cutting next year's projected budget deficit from $15 billion to $2 billion. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005).........60In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) ............... 2, 32 viiLaGrand v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
Antonin Scalia sees a different Constitution than does John Paul Stevens, but that simply says that the Constitution is capable of being interpreted in different ways, not that Scalia (or Stevens) has an "ideological agenda" that the other does not. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
Had the Goldstein court simply adopted Berman's rationale and applied it to the New York Constitution's takings clause, the opinion would not be particularly unusual. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'm at least a bit dubious, partly because the majority opinion in PGA Tour was written by Justice Stevens, who was an avid golfer. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]