Search for: "In Re Asbestos Cases" Results 441 - 460 of 857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
I can tell you with great certainty that these cases do not improve over time. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Illinois Central Railroad Co., No. 113812 – Did the trial court err by denying defendant's motion for dismissal pursuant to forum non conveniens of an asbestos injury claim brought by a non-resident of Illinois? [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:03 am
In these cases, many of these workers were unaware that they are working with asbestos. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Plaintiff alleges exposure to asbestos, diesel exhaust, sand, environmental tobacco smoke and toxic dusts, fumes and gases during his thirty-seven year employment with the defendant railroad. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:38 am
However, the widow then asked for a re-order, and the judges agreed to reinstate $2 million of that for her pain and suffering. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
The real outrage of these cases is that companies were well aware of the dangers of using asbestos, and continued to use it anyway, mostly because it was inexpensive. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:09 am
In some cases, they must wait weeks or months for an appointment. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
You Can’t Get There from HereWe’re somewhat less enamored with Romero v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:41 pm by Brad Pauley
  The Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four, held in a published decision, In re Marriage of Green, 205 Cal.App.4th 1475, that credit purchased during marriage was community property, and remanded the case to the trial court to consider allocation. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm by Bexis
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm by George David Wilson
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Number is 2262, which case is described briefly as follows: Title: In Re: LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation Assigned to:     Senior Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald [see also here] (U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:07 pm
In this case, I certainly know who Mark Lanier is, and was surprised to see him spending at this level. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:07 pm
In this case, I certainly know who Mark Lanier is, and was surprised to see him spending at this level. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:10 am
It has a latency period of between 10 and 50 years - which means people don't know for decades that they're sick. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:39 pm by David Oliver
If you're a maritime plaintiff and are unimpaired mere pleural thickening won't save your asbestos claim. [read post]