Search for: "In Re Certain Juvenile" Results 441 - 460 of 724
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 10:17 am by Suzanne Ito
Now, we're seeing a new round of the same hysteria directed at video games — old wine in new digital bottles. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Jeanette Moll
., juveniles charged with certain offenses (including some misdemeanors and non-violent, low-level felonies) and diagnosed with a mental illness, can apply to be diverted to a specialized mental health court. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:01 pm by Mark Bennett
In the course of the negotiations, certain promises were made by the merchants–for example, to remove the stores' humiliating racial signs. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
If you're reading this at work, you may be committing a federal crime (depending on where you are reading it, and you're employer's policies about reading the internet). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:28 am by SO Issues
“It created some additional demand, but we’re managing it,” Pulkrabek said. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by Jamison Koehler
  After listing things she either doesn’t do (juvenile defense, family law, DUIs) or won’t do (brag or exaggerate her credentials or experience), Seddiq turns her attention to the question often asked of criminal defense attorneys:  Do you work harder for a client if you believe the client is innocent? [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel Richardson
By Nicole KilloranIn re D.K., 2012 VT 23.The recipe for today’s case includes: two parts jurisdictional gap in juvenile prosecution; one part legislative hindsight; and seven parts youthful indiscretion. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Russ Bensing
  Graham avoids that problem by looking at the issue categorically:  the court is scrutinizing a certain category of offender — juveniles, in this case. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
(I may have to re-think this answer after November). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm by Alex Hunt
Breaking news today from the National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC): Today, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued their opinion in In Re C.P. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, sometimes you’re forbidden from reaping what you sow. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Thus, the government met its burden to show that the ban materially advanced its interest in preventing juvenile smoking. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” If marketing a product as “modified risk” raises the aggregate number of people, especially kids, who use tobacco by making them think the product is relatively safe, then that impairs the government’s compelling interest in reducing juvenile tobacco use. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The government responded that an “information deficit” still existed, especially among juveniles. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm by familoo
Many in my profession, in the family justice sector write off all fathers rights campaigners because of the juvenile antics of a few. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am by Russ Bensing
To a certain extent, Graham, and the Court’s other decisions on the scope of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause, point the way for resolution of Miller and Hobbs. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm by Andrew Dat
There are very few things in life that are certain. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:49 am by SO Issues
The other major change in the new law is that certain offenders can petition the court to be exempted. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:18 am by CJLF Staff
"But it doesn't work to reduce juvenile reoffending, because it doesn't really address the causes of juvenile offending. [read post]