Search for: "In Re John D." Results 441 - 460 of 8,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2007, 10:20 am
If you're in the running to be the Democratic party's presidential nominee, you'd better have a proposal to expand the Family and Medical Leave Act (and a health care plan, but that's a story for another day). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:28 am
If you're growing customer satisfaction, your global market share is sure to grow, too. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
Guidance on minimizing the risk of impairment comments and on responding to those comments If you’d like to join John or Meredith for a podcast to share insights on a securities law, capital markets or corporate governance topic, please reach out to them at john@thecorporatecounsel.net or mervine@ccrcorp.com. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Right-On Co., Ltd., Serial No. 79011373 (March 31, 2008) [not precedential].The Board, not surprisingly, found the word HONEYSUCKLE to be the dominant portion of the registered mark. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:02 am by John L. Welch
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Ride or NotText Copyright John L. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:41 pm by Jeralyn
And I'd bet she'd give money to his poverty foundations in the future. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 6:08 am by China Law Blog
What we’re reading right now, with suggestions from John Brittell (The State of Africa by Martin Meredith, Africa Beyond Aid by The Brenthurst Foundation, and The Future of Management by Gary Hammill), Jonathan (The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas), and Fred (Ghost Train to the Eastern Star by Paul Theroux). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists … barely. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:23 am
Conclusion: Confusion is likely, and so the Board affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Not exactly a hare-raising decision.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Experient Inc., Opposition No. 91190253 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark EXPERIENT for meeting, convention, exhibition, seminar, event, tradeshow, and conference services, in view of Opposer's alleged prior use of the identical mark EXPERIENT for event marketing and planning services].Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:07 am by John L. Welch
Moreover, the applications at issue are based on intent-to-use, and so there has been no opportunity for confusion.Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely, and it affirmed the refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]