Search for: "In Re NH" Results 441 - 460 of 657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Michael Scutt
Blogging and tweeting, in particular, encourages strong opinions and a controversial comment, especially if it involves a well known person or organisation could get re-tweeted or copied very quickly and widely. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:34 am by admin
  The move also went completely unmentioned amid all the hand-wringing after Fidelity announced last month that it would close its Marlboro campus and send most of those 1,100 jobs to its offices in Merrimack, NH, and Smithfield, RI. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:16 am by Katherine Gundersen
The Government has announced the next stage in its transparency agenda with a commitment to publish key data on the NHS, schools, criminal courts and transport. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:40 pm
(2) I think you're too optimistic about this President's "support" for free trade. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by admin
" Every year in the UK, personal injury claims are brought against the NHS following instances of clinical negligence. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In January 2010 the claimant re-applied by submitting his passport to the British High Commission in Sri Lanka. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:35 pm by admin
  Res ipsa loquitur, the thing speaks for itself. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:45 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
We applaud the EPA for moving ahead witha process for re-consideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS, in recognition that the previous Administration did not heed the science in making their decision. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Martin Downs
A substantial role was also given to NCAS – particularly with an eye to avoiding unnecessary suspensions and dismissals when re-training would be a better solution. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by Marie Louise
Teva and ratiopharm (EPLAW) Fentanyl – Germany: Federal Court of Justice: Lessons to be learned for claim construction and novelty: Xa ZR 149/07 (Kluwer Patent Blog) Finasteride – France: Tribunale de Grande Instance de Paris: Murder me twice – Merck’s dosage regime patent held invalid again: Teva v Merck Sharp & Dohme (EPLAW) Gaviscon (Sodium alginate, Sodium bicarbonate, Calcium carbonate) – UK: Reckitt Benckiser fined £10.2 M for halting supply of heartburn… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by familoo
Note the precise terminology: £1.2b to defend criminals (not for criminal defence), and immigrants trying to stay in the country (not the other kind who want to leave, we don’t mind them), and alleged mistreatment at the hands of the NHS and police (we’re prepared to accept all criminal defendants are guilty, but those criticising our beloved national institutions are heretics), and prisoners upset at jail conditions (not prisoner’s whose human rights have… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
Significantly Bermuda recently passed the Court of Appeal Amendment Act which allows prosecutors to re-try Court of Appeal cases when new and compelling evidence arises. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:09 pm
What happens if you're in dire straits but have a high number? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:53 am by Charon QC
This story ought to serve as a salutary lesson to all of us to watch how information is presented and what happens while we’re looking the other way. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the application of) v Parole Board & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 360… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:42 am by INFORRM
A (A Child) v Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 454 (QB) A High Court judge has ruled that a seven-year-old child with severe disabilities caused by medical negligence during his birth should be the subject of an order that prohibits their identification in any newspaper report. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:53 am by admin
We're wasting money because of a failure to get these policies right. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm by Maria Roche
Commentary: This judgment, like that in JXF (a child) v York Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2010] EWHC 2800 (QB) where an anonymity order was granted to a child, will be of importance whenever a child claimant who is likely to attain capacity seeks anonymity. [read post]