Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections" Results 441 - 460 of 1,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
In Latin America, we’re seeing this dynamic play out in real time. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:51 am by David Pocklington
[Re All Saints Cossington [2022] ECC Lei 3] [Top of section] [Top of post] Reordering and alternative uses Re St Mary the Virgin Wheatley [2021] ECC Oxf 8 The petition proposed several items of reordering; the Victorian Society became a party opponent, objecting to one specific item, namely, the treatment of the Victorian plain black and red tiling in the nave of the Grade II* church. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
In chronological order, here are the courts of appeals' decisions:a. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
Apple is now embroiled in a particularly intense and escalating fight with Qualcomm, and there may be reasons for which they're particularly proactive, though Samsung isn't just sitting by idly. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:02 am by Andres
User: liability through misuse of the device, or neglect in keeping it in order (missing a vital patch). [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
  The ironic part, of course, is that this si precisely what many progressives wanted--the re-introduction of vigorous government in the management of economic activity--it is just that this is not quite the sort of activity they might have had in mind. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:35 am by Abhik Majumdar
Will it aid or hinder the system's original aims and objectives? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:42 am by Abhik Majumdar
Will it aid or hinder the system's original aims and objectives? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  NYC has proposed to ban “flushable” claims unless they’re certified by a third party test approved by NYC. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
After the federal court ordered sanctions, effective negotiations shut down for a period of time because both sides were focused on the ramifications of the order. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
 But we’re not talking about most judges… we’re talking about the Honorable Judge Robert E. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The reason the marks strike us as bizarre is that they’re overreaching; trying to protect too small a component or trying to protect aesthetic appeal. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
 As a result, it is preferable to examine objectively the causal association between promotion and sales using econometric models. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 In truth, they're best understood to stand for this far-more-modest proposition, which appears in the 1995 OLC opinion on which Trump places the most weight:  “[A] statute that does not by its express terms apply to the President may not be applied to the President if doing so would raise a serious question under the separation of powers. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
The First Question The first question is an objective one, that is: “The question is what a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would feel if she was placed in the same position as the claimant and faced with the same publicity” (Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481, [35]). [read post]