Search for: "In re I. W."
Results 441 - 460
of 7,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
See GA Res. 56/169, para. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Part I. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
In dicta, however, it suggested that everyday conversation ordinarily should not be the subject of copyright: [W]e should be wary about excluding all possibility of protecting a speaker’s right to decide when his words, uttered in private dialogue, may or may not be published at large. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Gregory W. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
“[W]hen former spouses have grossly disparate earning potentials, the goal of financial independence may not be achievable because of the dependent former spouse’s inability to maintain the standard of living shared during the marriage. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 6:53 am
I find it hard to get too worked up over all this, the way I did over the egregious conflicts of Donald Trump’s family during the last administration. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:38 pm
You're right, they don't. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:16 am
In re Deborah J. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
W. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:40 am
" W. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In re McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In re McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In my forthcoming article, I discuss Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and the administrative legacy its implementation history has had on the SEC. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Sara W. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In re Lizzo LLC, 23 USPQ2d 139 (TTAB 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
If I videotape a show, watch it, then sell on eBay, hard to see how that project as a whole is fair use, particularly w/erasable, usable materials. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 9:09 am
Either involuntarily imposed on us or adopted from UK w/o adaptation to local needs/lack of resources in former colonies. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
I could think that copyright is relatively neutral in an incredibly sexist society. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:58 pm
It is a fallacy to equate tools with capabilities—interviews w/professional producers, engineers, and label executives. [read post]
