Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 441 - 460
of 13,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 7:14 pm
"Anybody that's going to come here is going to face the scrutiny of our county district attorney, our Sheriff's Department, our code enforcement, and we're going to be monitoring them," Stone said. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Today, we're focusing on one of my favorite dominion and control cases, Roberts v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:25 pm
" You're probably not going to Subway as a summer associate (Cosi, maybe). [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:30 pm
Since it involves a blend of civil procedure, internet law, and copyright -- i.e., my entire teaching package -- I really have no excuse for not posting on the Wikileaks injunction matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:15 am
We have written previously on numerous developments concerning reverse payments in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlements (i.e., payments made by branded pharmaceutical patent holders to generic challengers to postpone market entry of proposed generic products). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:23 am
In addition to having a vision (i.e. a business concept you can monetize, BTW there are lots of good ones still available because It's Early in Web Years) you're going to need one key ingredient that is not taught in business school (or in any other educational discipline for that matter) and that is persistence in the face of risk. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In re Katrina Canal Breaches, No. 05-1482 (E.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In re Katrina Canal Breaches, No. 05-1482 (E.D. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:22 am
Furthermore, since it did not itself sell alcoholic beverages, it did not need any governmental certification or permit.The Board found that, at a minimum, a genuine dispute of material fact existed as to whether "proprietors in respondent's field of trade, as well as their respective customers, would perceive respondent's goods, i.e., CROC-TAIL brand cocktails, as goods in trade pursuant to the provisions of the Trademark Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:06 pm
However, in the recent case of In re El Toro Materials Company, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Last Friday, In re Mostafazadeh was argued before the CAFC (argument here). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:59 am
In re Prudential Ins. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:03 am
Today we're featuring the new website for the Douglas County (Oregon) Law Library. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
Even if you're not persuaded by that reasoning. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:07 pm
(i.e. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 11:11 am
The sad thing is that--other than some very minor disagreements about the way certain things were handled--there appears to have been no dishonesty on either side, just a conflict of personalities.If you're a partner--even if you believe you're doing the bulk of the work--remember that you owe duties to your other partners to be open, honest and forthcoming. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
In re Youman, 679 F.3d at 1343–45 (citing In re Mostafazadeh, 643 F.3d at 1360 (“The recapture rule is triggered only where the reissue claims are broader than the patented claims because the surrendered subject matter has been reclaimed in whole or substantial part (i.e., an added limitation has been eliminated or revised). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm
The 3 R’s of Referral Marketing are: Remind people that you exist, what you do exactly, and that you care about helping people (i.e. that you’re empathetic) Regularly remind them (i.e. at least once per month, NOT just around New Years when everyone is sending holiday cards etc.) [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
Since our tax system relies on voluntary reporting of income (i.e. you volunteer your tax information to the IRS and tell them how much you owe), the IRS uses the fear of audits to scare people into being honest. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
(i.e., older white males), in violation of Batson v. [read post]
