Search for: "In re Juvenile -A & a." Results 441 - 460 of 3,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
Filed April 3, 2007--Opinion by Judge Mary Ellen Barbera.The issue is what a petition alleging juvenile delinquency must contain as a factual basis to support the allegation. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:35 pm by Unreported Opinions
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Attempted first-degree murder Appellant, T.J.J., was charged in the Circuit Court for Charles County with (i) attempted first-degree murder, (ii) attempted second-degree murder, (iii) first-degree assault, (iv) second-degree assault, (v) reckless endangerment, and (vi) having openly carried a dangerous weapon with the intent to injure. [read post]
26 May 2015, 1:52 pm by Daily Record Staff
Juvenile law — Illegal sentence — Minimum period of confinement On July 2, 2014, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Tyrone B., appellant, pled involved to a single count of third-degree burglary. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 2:08 pm by Daily Record Staff
She was charged in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, sitting as a juvenile court, with violating Md. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 10:17 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Cell phone video Found to be involved in the delinquent act of second degree assault, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (sitting as the juvenile court), D. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm by Daily Record Staff
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Unlawful taking of a vehicle Suave L.S., Appellant, was found involved in motor vehicle theft, unauthorized removal of a motor vehicle, and theft under $1,000, in violation of Maryland Code (2002, 2012 Repl. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 6:35 pm
The National Constitution Center, in partnership with the Juvenile Law Center, honors the fortieth anniversary of the In re Gault Supreme Court decision--determining that proceedings for juveniles had to comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment--with a conversation about the state of children’s rights under the Constitution then and now. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by admin
In 2016, the American Supreme court ruled juveniles who received life sentences for killing a single person should have a shot at parole. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am by MBettman
Case Background After several appeals and re-sentencings, Brandon Moore was sentenced to a 112-year prison term for convictions in 2002 on three counts of rape, three counts of complicity to rape, three counts of aggravated robbery, kidnapping, and firearm offenses, all arising from offenses he committed when he was fifteen years old. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
On the one hand, there's the state's obvious interest in controlling juvenile delinquency, an interest that's reflected by (amongst other statutes) Section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, whch grants state court the power to declare any juvenile who "violates any law . . . of the United States" a ward of the court. [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:31 pm
The recent decision in the case, In re I.J., et al., will govern juvenile and family court proceedings in San Diego and throughout the State of California where similar facts are presented. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Brian Goldstein
As such, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) recently found an 80% re-arrest rate within three years of a youth’s release. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:13 am
In re James Allen Hall, No. 07-0322 (DocketDB) Most attorneys never encounter it, but the Texas Supreme Court does have jurisdiction over a special slice of criminal law — juvenile justice cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
IN RE GAULT (1967)--Case that determined the Constitution requires a separate juvenile justice system with certain standard procedures and protections, but still not as many as in adult systems. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
2011AP1747, 2011AP1748, 2011AP1749, 2011AP1750 In re the termination of parental rights to Lamontae B., et al. [read post]