Search for: "In re Watkins"
Results 441 - 460
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 10:00 am
It simply never analyzes the limitation on the injunctive relief available under the federal claim.Eventually, it will be interesting to see if Illinois courts re-evaluate the inevitable disclosure doctrine. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:56 am
(There are a bunch of other exceptions, but they’re not relevant here.) [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 3:28 am
At the Texas Youth Commission, a probably unnecessary contract to re-categorize inmates was given with no bidding process to Gregg Phillips, a lobbyist friend of former state Rep. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
We’re also seeing some investments in training initiatives. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
"They're not raising because they value us. [read post]
8 May 2010, 3:03 pm
Skadden, Sullivan & Cromwell, Willkie Farr, Cahill Gordon, Latham & Watkins, and others got pieces of that action. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:14 am
" But 2010 was also the year in which some brave souls left the comfort of biglaw partnership behind to pursue entrepreneurship — like former Latham & Watkins mega-partner Joshua Stein whom we profiled in this newsletter. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:19 am
I suspect we’re about to see that rule applied, with force, to law firms. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 4:45 pm
Dallas District Attorney Craig Watkins has proposed creating criminal penalties for knowing Brady violations by prosecutors. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 7:05 am
We agreed with Richardson in In re Estate of Watkins, 572 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
“When you’re raising the money for yourself, it’s going into your own pocket – you’re more grateful to the donor,” said Robert Stern, the former top attorney at the Fair Political Practices Commission who helped write the Political Reform Act. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
OpinionsSUPREME COURT MANDAMUS ENDS SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE SUITIn Re Schmitz, (Tex. 2009)No. 07-0581 (Tex. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:44 am
- Proposed Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law: Section 251(h) Mergers & More - The Evolving Face of Deal Litigation - Rural Metro: Potential Practice Implications Going Forward - New Urgency for Corporate Inversion Transactions If you’re not yet a subscriber, try a Half-Price for Rest of ’14 no-risk trial to get a non-blurred version of this issue on a complimentary basis. - Broc Romanek [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
You can even re-open the table in the Word document while in Word and edit the Excel spreadsheet. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:20 pm
” We’re turning back now because we have discovered it is expensive to warehouse people. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:23 am
If you're not yet a member of TheCorporateCounsel.net, try a no-risk trial for 2011 and gain access to this webcast for free [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:24 pm
Thank you to Ross Watkins for his contribution to this article. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
“BlawgWorld 2006 was excellent so I’m looking forward to reading the 2007 edition,” said Joshua Stein, a partner at Latham & Watkins. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 7:56 am
” The system analyze re-insurance contracts to identify automatically biases toward either the reinsurer or the reinsured. [read post]
