Search for: "In-Rel Properties, Inc." Results 441 - 460 of 1,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2009, 6:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
Technology Properties Ltd., Case Nos. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:50 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm by Florian Mueller
I can see why Google thinks it has nothing to lose by eschewing the Ninth Circuit, but two months ago Chief Judge Rader of the Federal Circuit repeatedly called Google's royalty demands from Apple "crazy" -- and that assessment related to one of Motorola's cellular SEPs, which Judge Robart actually considered, relatively speaking, much more valuable than the video codec and WiFi SEPs at issue in the Microsoft case...If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
But the drop in the shares' value, relative to the fixed cash payment, changed that. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:41 am by David DePaolo
But the agency’s request for proposals states all documents submitted will become the property of the state and “will be regarded as public records under the California Public Records Act and subject to review by the public. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
If I wanted to see the complaints and other filings from these cases, I could go to the various San Bernardino courthouses (primarily Rancho Cucamonga and downtown San Bernardino) and get copies for a relatively modest amount (more than Kinkos, less than many lawyers charge clients for copying). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm by Morgan Cloud
The decision is an important step in clarifying the scope of the court’s 2016 decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Traditional ICT innovators apparently don't want design patent holders to be overcompensated to an extent that would have chilling and stifling effects on true innovation.The companies supporting Apple's design patent damages award are, relatively speaking (i.e., by comparison with CCIA's membership), no-tech and low-tech companies and one pharma/medical devices company (Novo Nordisk; not an ITC player either): Crocs, Inc.; Design Ideas, Ltd.; Novo Nordisk,… [read post]