Search for: "Insulations, Inc." Results 441 - 460 of 1,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Larry Ribstein
ATT, Inc.: We reject the argument that because “person” is defined for purposes of FOIA to include a corporation, the phrase “personal privacy” in Exemption 7(C) reaches corporations as well. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 11:25 am
Portsmouth Federal Building Portsmouth Hospital Schiller Power Station Heating Supply, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
IMS Health, Inc., No. 10-779, slip op. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 7:35 pm
- Matrixx Initiatives Inc. and Zicam L.L.C., were jointly the developers, manufacturers and distributor of this product. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:13 pm by Alejandro Moreno and Eugene Choi
Jan. 26, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Laster, V.C.) held that officers of a Delaware corporation are subject to a fiduciary duty of oversight as articulated in In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am by Robin Wilson
., Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2008) — The constitutional challenges presented by Perry v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 9:52 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc., et al., the Supreme Court of Florida reinforced that the concept of causation in medical malpractice is broad and should be left to a jury. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  By requiring what amounts to be affirmative evidence of a fiduciary duty violation, without allowing the facts themselves to be sufficient to justify inspection, the courts essentially insulate board actions from shareholder review and, more critically, from shareholder challenge. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw
He described the language in the KBR Order as “certainly instructive” but “not restrictive” and not insulating a company from further scrutiny by the SEC. [read post]
Importantly, while departing from the bright-line safeguards results in a per se violation, if an employer simply provides these assurances at the outset, it does not wholly insulate an employer from a subsequent ULP charge of coercive questioning. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon The National Labor Relations Board’s decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., announced last week, dramatically expands joint employer liability under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
The Navy, in most instances, specified asbestos replacement gaskets, packing and insulation. [read post]