Search for: "Irvine v. Irvine" Results 441 - 460 of 888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 3:43 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Solomon (University of New Mexico - School of Law and University of California, Irvine School of Law) have posted Impossible Choices: Balancing Safety and Security in Domestic Violence Representation on SSRN. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:33 pm by James Yang
As an Irvine Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, The John Marshall Law School Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky (both of Cal Irvine) published an American Constitution Society Issue Brief last week that boldly sets out the implications of Harris v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:55 pm by James Yang
As an Irvine Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
The leading case on false endorsement is Irvine v Talksport [2002] FSR 60, in which Eddie Irvine successfully argued passing off when Talksport used his image for an advertising campaign. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 2:04 pm by James Yang
 Priority date is the primary dispute in EnOcean case The issue in EnOcean v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
  And in the third decision of the day, Burrage v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm by James Yang
Explanation of technology can impact result of patent suit In Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:12 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 2697 (ED CA, Jan. 8, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge permitted a Muslim inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was denied a halal diet and the ability to purchase halal meat.In Irvin v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:06 pm by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]