Search for: "Ives v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 7,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
V. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:59 pm
With this background in mind, Section IV explores the federal regulatory regime that governs nursing homes, and Section V details the bodies and mechanisms that enforce federal rules and regulations. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
" Justice Alito dissented, joined by Justice Stevens, while Justice Breyer concurred only in part IV of the majority opinion (and the result), but joined Justice Alito’s dissent to the remainder of the decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
From Linthicum v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:00 am
In Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 10:07 am
Hobia (Indian Gaming; Tribal Lands) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlMiccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
§ 1071(b)(1) seeking judicial review of the TTAB's March 2009 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
The clause, spelled out in Article IV, requires the states to respect the “public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:22 pm
[iv] Ibid. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:30 pm
Finally, Part V discusses how the three legal frameworks interact with each other. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:25 am
The Court stated that a professional negligence claim, similar to any negligence claim, requires the plaintiff to establish: (i) a duty was owed to Plaintiff; (ii) a breach of that duty; (iii) causation between the breach and the harm; and (iv) damages. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:44 am
In this post, Holly Ranfield, Associate at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am
To the relief of employers, Browning-Ferris quickly appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
” The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
