Search for: "J. K."
Results 441 - 460
of 6,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 12:54 pm
On July 16, Dallas lawyer Kim J. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:00 am
Paul K. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
J. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 10:47 am
Jeffery J. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:10 pm
District Court in Baltimore, Judge J. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
It appears in MODERNISM AND COPYRIGHT, Paul K. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:51 pm
Casey Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez Robert K. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:17 pm
Fjelsted DA 18-0499 2020 MT 278 Criminal – DUI-Felony K & J v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:20 pm
Probs. i (2020) Daniel K. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 2:52 pm
Especially like the Library Lifepost. i+j=k - (information + judgement = knowledge) librarian blogging since end of Jan. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:20 am
Shih-Chun Steven Chien (American Bar Foundation; Google Scholar), Ajay K. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:06 pm
Wiedenbeck (Washington U.), Rachael K. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:57 pm
San Francisco Chronicle, May 1, 2011 by Debra J. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:30 am
Co-hosts and attorneys J. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:46 pm
) - Mortality of Elderly Individuals with TBI in the First 5 Years Following Injury (Hirshson CI, Gordon WA, Singh A, Ambrose A, Spielman L, Dams-O'Connor K, Cantor J, Dijkers M [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:25 pm
Sebenius, & Michael K. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
The decision deals with an appeal filed against the decision of the Receiving Section that a divisional would not be treated as such because the parent application was not pending any more.Here is a simplified (!) [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
This decision on a request for reestablishment is interesting above all because of the unusual auxiliary requests:The appellant requests:(1) Reestablishment and immediate examination of the application;(2) Replacement of claim 1 by claim 1C(3) Reimbursement of all costs that have arisen to the appellant (Appeal fee, annuities as from the third year and compensation amounts as well as training lessons in technical mechanics and EP patent rules) by the first examiner;(4) Replacement of the first… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with a request for the reimbursement of certain fees for a divisional application.On filing the divisional application on EPO Form 1001E, no mode of payment was specified under point 42 “Payment” of that form. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
This decision deals with the rejection of an application by the Receiving Section (RS). [read post]
