Search for: "J. v. K"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Unfortunately for them, Arnold J found that the research did not separate the results into the relevant class, that the sector was dominated by a small number of vehicle rental companies and that, until Europcar adopted the e-moving logo, Enterprise was the only company in the sector which used a lower case 'e' logo on a green background.The SurveysArnold J then introduced the surveys. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Brown, Matthew K. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Exch. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
I do not accept Mr K’s midpoint valuation of $2,686,467 because of the deficiencies outlined above and prefer Mr A’s valuation. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Patricia J. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
LANGOWSKI, n/k/a REBECCA J. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:30 pm
The ED also stated its reasons for not being able to grant the main request and the auxiliary requests I, II, III, and V. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
Sun Street Properties Ltd v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 72 (Dec) [no transcript available yet]Or, what the hell is going on about Occupy/Bank of Ideas and the property owned by Union Bank of Switzerland. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 7:54 pm
Yesterday, law professor Eric J. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
Co. (1st Dept., decided 11/13/2008) Arch Insurance Company insured B&J Welding & Iron Works, n/k/a Mid Island Steel Corporation. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:08 am
Stevens represented the petitioner in Atherton v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm
Blase, Christopher J. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:54 pm
Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm
MARIANNE K. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:01 am
Anne Peters, Konstitutionalismus als globale Errungenschaft Christian J. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Thus, we adopt comment k’s basic policy as the law to be applied in this state.Grundberg v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
On Wednesday 29 April 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland) .This appeal will consider whether the taxpayer (K E Entertainment Ltd)’s claim to a repayment of VAT fell within the scope of the Principal VAT Directive, Articles 73 and 90, together with (if necessary) VAT Regulation 38 (as the taxpayer contends) or within VAT Act section 80 and is therefore… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:56 pm
Flying J Inc. [read post]
