Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 441 - 460 of 7,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And here is the second decision that was upheld, Magistrate Judge John Anderson's decision in Doe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am by Chip Merlin
Certified Property Loss Appraiser (CPLA) does so with the responsibility of performing these services and conducting themselves in a manner that will uphold the integrity, trust, and fairness inherent of the process and their appointment to serve in the capacity of a Property Loss Appraiser. 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Constitution does not recognize a fundamental right to education, which leaves all types of learning, including civic education, without this support (San Antonio ISD v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 3-2 to reopen public comment on its proposal to expand the definition of “exchange” to include decentralized cryptocurrency platforms. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, both parties respectfully request in the absence of a sealing of the entire Court record, that Plaintiff's name be replaced with "John Doe" and that the parties be permitted to re-file the exhibits identified by ECF numbers 1-3, 1-6, 1-7, 5-1, 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-6, 9-1, and 13, which currently contain personally identifying information…. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 12:20 pm by Brent Wieand
  Indicator #2:  Abuse Icon CMS Care Compare began use of an “abuse icon” in 2019. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
VPX argued that Monster didn’t show irreparable harm because: (1) the harms are purely economic; (2) VPX “abandoned any marketing focus on Super Creatine or creatine” before the jury rendered its verdict; and (3) VPX’s remediation obviates the need for an injunction. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
—then wrote Bragg to request (1) all documents and communications between Bragg’s office and federal law enforcement regarding the Trump investigation, (2) all documents and communications to/from Dunne and Pomerantz regarding Trump, and (3) all documents and communications regarding the office’s use of federal funds. [read post]
And, sure, read this way, subsection (c)(2) is broad enough to swallow (c)(1) whole and then some (so what’s the point in subsection (c)(1), you might ask), but so what? [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:30 am by Guest Author
” It does not announce any new legal standard (binding or otherwise). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:30 am by Guest Author
” It does not announce any new legal standard (binding or otherwise). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am by John Coyle
These provisions of the draft law generally track Article 2(1)(b) of the U.N. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “”Under Judiciary Law § 487(1), an attorney who ‘[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, [*3]or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party’ is liable to the injured party for treble damages” (Altman v DiPreta, 204 AD3d 965, 968). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:35 am by Robert Kraft
Author Infor: John Lewis is a freelance writer who specializes in creating content for seniors struggling with disabilities. [read post]