Search for: "John Does 1-18" Results 441 - 460 of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
” The law concerning statutory rape was amended July 1, 2006. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:30 am
It's not easy to justify a Section 18 restriction.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
Category: Claim Construction       By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleInterval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
The Wood case demonstrates an exception to this rule: The power to appoint does not support a claim of the power to remove an incumbent when removal from the position in question is provided for by statute.William J. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:55 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Part 2 of the “Two New Privacy Lawsuits Filed” TopicAlso on December 17, 2009, (see prior post about Facebook complaint), a Jane Doe plaintiff and three other individual plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint in the Northern District of California against Netflix and John Doe defendants 1-50, alleging violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:30 am
The Government rightly points out that this sentence “does not necessarily”imply that John knew whom the homework belonged to. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
 See In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Johanson), 632 F.2d 1033, 1040 (3d Cir. 1980) (citing 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:02 am by Susan Brenner
As you can read in this short online article about drafting a federal complaint, plaintiffs who want to sue someone but don’t know their identity can file a complaint naming John Doe (or John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, etc.) as the defendant(s). [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:25 pm
Sussex I State Prison Defendants -Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-100 Defendant ORDER Appellant filed an application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a motion to place this case in abeyance and enjoin appellees from executing him on October 17, 2007, pending decision by the United States Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]