Search for: "Johnson v. Case" Results 441 - 460 of 7,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 6:21 am by Kali Borkoski
Board of Chosen Freeholders, for us last week, while Kevin Johnson, Dean of the UC Davis School of Law, previewed the second case, Judulang v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm by Sung Un Kim
The Honourable Rob Nicholson [official website] for Niagara Falls, the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada made a public statement about the planned appeal in the case of Lee Carter and Hollis Johnson et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:44 am by Andrew Hamm
The Court issued per curiam opinions in two cases: Johnson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:45 pm
Here's a case study on how not to request a fee award in a class action.Justice Johnson's lengthy opinion is a blistering indictment of attorney Lori Sklar. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:32 pm by Seth
UPDATE: John Schedin’s “bellwether” Levaquin case is heading to the jury… November 30, 2010 P0st: John Schedin took the medicine Levaquin in 2005 and soon after suffered injury to both his achilles tendons,  a known risk of the drug for a relatively small number of users of the drug, an antibiotic. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Stephanie Zable
The decision followed from the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling Johnson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:08 am by Dan Bunting, 2 Dr Johnson's Building
This would be contrary to usual principles (see Sweet v Parsley [1970] AC 132 and cases thereafter), in particular the strong aversion of the common law to offences of strict liability. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
On some days, it's hard to get back into the routine.We'd rather keep mining the depths of Colacicco to see what nuggets we can unearth there.But we owe it to you to provide a short post about the California Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:32 am by Ken White
Johnson, the case in which the court eventually found that flag burning (as opposed to bad-mouthing the flag) was constitutionally protected speech. [read post]