Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders" Results 441 - 460 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 05411-19 Lennox v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 3 Harassment (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05158-19 Bashagha v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2018), No breach – after investigation 05157-19 Bashagha v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), 4… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
Georgia) defending American nationalism and popular sovereignty. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the defendants’ appeal and allowed the plaintiff’s appeal, in part, in the case of Rooney v Galloway 2024 BCCA 8. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9560, involves a defendant who came to the U.S. from the United Arab Emirates on a student visa. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Kernott v Jones, heard 4 May 2011. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The former No 10 spin doctor is charged, along with former royal editor Clive Goodman, with two counts of conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office in relation to payments to police officers for books containing Palace contacts. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
” The Supreme Court upheld the federal presidential public funds provision in Buckley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth 13-1520Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment or Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of Piepenbrock v Michell, LSE and 52 other Defendants KB-2023-001023 before Tipples J. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
On appeal, defendants argued that the plaintiff’s description of its trade secrets was inadequate because it did not state which secrets it claimed that the defendant had misappropriated. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The defendants denied the gravity and extent of the infringement of those rights – denying that more senior officers knew or acquiesced to the relationship. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
At the invitation of the Court, Ohio State law professor Deborah Jones Merritt will defend the Second Circuit ruling at issue, since neither side in the case would do so. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The claim related to a publication on the defendant’s website in around June 2019, and for about six months thereafter, of the following words: “The British Boxing Board of Control – Southern Area Council – June 2019 Notices – Regulation 25 – Jeff Hinds Given Words of Advice for the future. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]