Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 7:41 am
" If the special court won't allow the warning, the lawyers argue that the matter should at minimum be remanded to the Judicial Conduct Commission for consideration of one of the alternative rulings. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
Indeed, the non-delegation doctrine should allow plenty of judicial lawmaking—and it does. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:56 pm
Baroness Prashar of Runnymede, despite her appointment as Chairman of the Judicial Appointments Commission, is not one of the sharpest of questioners on current performance, at any rate. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:28 pm
” The Court emphasized that “the very existence of effective judicial review designed to ensure compliance with provisions of EU law is inherent in the existence of the rule of law. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
OCC, which is owned by five shareholder exchanges, currently is the only clearing agency for standardized U.S. options listed on U.S. exchanges. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:18 am
After issuance of the final interim rule, Texas requested a stay of the rule in the DC Circuit. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
Circuit also summarily declined to stay the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)’s Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations final rule on July 27, in National Association of Broadcasters v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
Circuit also summarily declined to stay the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)’s Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations final rule on July 27, in National Association of Broadcasters v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requested, on April 11, 2012, pre-rule input on implementation of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act, recently signed into law. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:34 am
The underlying rationale of the ITC ruling is a serious threat to innovation and competition. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:01 pm
The article quotes FTC official David Vladeck as saying that the agency's “settlements serve the public interest and meet any applicable standard of judicial review. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:29 am
Now that rule has been cemented in a decision authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the contrary rule of the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:41 am
Applying that standard, the court held that a hearing is "required by law" when it is required by rule, statute, or the constitution.The Intermediate Court of Appeals decision, in contrast, held that a contested case was a quasi-adjudicatory agency hearing, and differed greatly from a quasi-legislative public agency hearing. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:11 am
Michelle Cochran, involved an SEC enforcement action alleging that Cochran violated auditing standards. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
In a Harvard Law & Policy Review article, Kurt Walters, then a judicial law clerk, called for a return of consumer protection rulemaking by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
This article notes that “the concern that drives this exclusionary principle [is] one of pre-emption,” and queries whether, given the Supreme Court’s “standard approach of construing a statutory exception narrowly to preserve the primary operation of the general rule,” the implicit statutory exception to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
This article notes that “the concern that drives this exclusionary principle [is] one of pre-emption,” and queries whether, given the Supreme Court’s “standard approach of construing a statutory exception narrowly to preserve the primary operation of the general rule,” the implicit statutory exception to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, the Supreme Court confirmed that these general principles of standing apply when legislative bodies assert institutional injuries in federal court. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
It opted for these stringent rules instead of either the more nuanced standards contained in the jurisprudence developed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the Strasbourg-based judicial arm of the Council of Europe, or those contained in member state constitutional law. [read post]
