Search for: "Kaufman v. Kaufman" Results 441 - 460 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Mar. 29, 2012) (no coherent methodology; unhelpful; legal conclusions; narrative testimony; unqualified to give medical testimony; ipse dixit; reliance on after-the-fact events); Kaufman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the proposed supplement to the complaint seeking to add a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 was “patently devoid of merit” (McIntosh v Ronit Realty, LLC, 181 AD3d 579, 580; see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1092-1093). [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any case, since RFL’s retainer was signed only on behalf of the LIMGA shareholders, not on behalf of any entity in which Gabay or LIMA had a legal interest, RFL did not have a duty to the plaintiffs (see Strujan v Kaufman & Kahn, LLP, 168 AD3d 1114, 1115; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698), and the alleged conflict of interest did not arise. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm by Erik Gerding
  A great recent paper by Ryan Bubb (NYU Law) and Alex Kaufman both suggests that they do and explains why. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
" Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black wrote those words in the Gideon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:37 pm
' So, before the sunwas down, we had the rule that is now Rule 10b-5.Today the W$J Blog is reporting that Senators Arlen Specter, Jack Reed, and Edward Kaufman are sponsoring a bill to upend the Supreme Court's 2007 opinion in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:59 am by Shaun Kaufman
Double Jeopardy in a Recent Colorado Case In People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:58 am by Shaun Kaufman
Double Jeopardy in a Recent Colorado Case In People v. [read post]