Search for: "Kaufman v. Kaufman"
Results 441 - 460
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
Kaufman. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am
Here, the proposed supplement to the complaint seeking to add a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 was “patently devoid of merit” (McIntosh v Ronit Realty, LLC, 181 AD3d 579, 580; see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1092-1093). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:02 pm
" Id. at 144 (quoting Mitan, 243 F.Supp.2d at 724); see also Kaufman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:02 am
Kaufman & Broad Home Corp., 89 Cal. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
In any case, since RFL’s retainer was signed only on behalf of the LIMGA shareholders, not on behalf of any entity in which Gabay or LIMA had a legal interest, RFL did not have a duty to the plaintiffs (see Strujan v Kaufman & Kahn, LLP, 168 AD3d 1114, 1115; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698), and the alleged conflict of interest did not arise. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm
Key v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
” In Bullock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:15 am
Or Washington v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
"A Charlie Kaufman-Spike Jonze reunion brews" http://j.mp/g2I7l7 the slatest asks "Which Web Sites Are the Dumbest? [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the now famous case of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:34 am
" Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black wrote those words in the Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
A great recent paper by Ryan Bubb (NYU Law) and Alex Kaufman both suggests that they do and explains why. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:37 pm
Oh wait, there is no constitutional right to education (Kadrmas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
Medvedev plays out, President Vladimir V. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
Double Jeopardy in a Recent Colorado Case In People v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:00 am
Asa result, it's unlikely that circumstances will allow a court to finesse the issue as the Third Circuit did with perfume sensitivity in Kaufman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
Double Jeopardy in a Recent Colorado Case In People v. [read post]
