Search for: "Kay v. Kay" Results 441 - 460 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 am by Pace Law Library
[et al.]WATER LAWThe politics of water : a survey / editors, Kai Wegerich and Jeroen Warner [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: On May 18, 2022, the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy published online an essay by Stephanie Nicole Miller and Mary Kay Bacallao. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:35 pm
Early scrutiny of methods used during questioning of such persons occurred in the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Ireland v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Branding Extremes: Panda Cheese v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Short Circuit, scroll to 14th item on Ninth Circuit decision in Arizona Students’ Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:56 am by INFORRM
On 1 February 2012, in their judgment in the case of Coogan and Phillips v NGN and Mulcaire  ([2012] EWCA Civ 48) the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions put to him by the two claimants. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm
In addition, Oklahoma's Electric Restructuring Act expressed an unmistakable policy preference for competition in the provision of electricity, according to the court.The decision is Kay Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  We will mention only three – the first instance judgment in the privacy case of WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J), the Court of Appeal judgment in the “privilege against self-incrimination” case of Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 by Judge LCJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P and the Supreme Court “Reynolds” judgment in Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 17 and 18 October 2011. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
The appeal to the CJ, which was heard shortly after Kay v Lambeth in the Lords, was allowed on the basis that, given the Council’s letter, quoted above, it was seriously arguable that the Council had acted in a way no reasonable person would consider justifiable. [read post]