Search for: "Kennedy v. Morales" Results 441 - 460 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 2:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy — and culminating in the Windsor decision last June. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor joined), was predicated on the view that the installing of a GPS device was a trespass, and so this physical intrusion needed to be grounded on a warrant to comply with the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
  There's no  other explanation.I was reminded of this the other day when I underwent the dreary ordeal of re-reading Justice Ginsburg's recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 That was the year the Court decided Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Kathleen Sullivan for Coca Cola said that consumers weren’t so unintelligent not to recognize the blend; Kennedy says “I thought that this was pomegranate juice. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Indeed, this is how the Warren Court treated the unenumerated “right to privacy” it first recognized in Griswold v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
Naim (1956), an error later rectified in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]