Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 441 - 460
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences criticizes a recent Los Angeles Times article on Justice Thomas (to which Nabiha linked in yesterday’s round-up) as “skewed . . . to give the reader a distorted view of [the Justice’s] jurisprudence. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:40 pm
CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger noted that 13 of the inmates on death row have exhausted all appeals and could be executed immediately. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger argues that Smith’s case “was not a clean” one in which to decide whether “the jury and not the judge” must “make the additional findings that state law requires before a ‘death-eligible’ defendant is actually sentenced to death,” “although the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Yesterday, along with Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, I filed an amicus brief for the Van Treese family and the Oklahoma District Attorneys Association. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on Justice Ginsburg’s statement concurring in the Court’s denial in Hittson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause at Hamilton and… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” And Kent Scheidegger discusses the issues in the case in a podcast for the Federalist Society. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Orin Kerr has this initial post and these thoughts on the Court's new habeas exception at Volokh Conspiracy; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who writes that “[t]his is likely the last provision of the Bill of Rights to be ‘incorporated. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
Kent Scheidegger at the blog Crime and Consequences also discusses Hill and Dorsey, commenting on a recent New York Times article on the cases, which Nabiha included in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:18 am
” (& Althouse, Leef/Phi Beta Cons, Horwitz, Instapundit, State Bar of Michigan, Elie Mystal/Above the Law, Kent Scheidegger/Crime and Consequences, Andrew Kloster/FIRE and earlier, Federalist Society blog, earlier) [Original post:] “A woman who alleges she was denied a job at the University of Iowa College of Law because of her conservative politics can proceed with a discrimination lawsuit against the school’s former dean, a federal appeals court ruled [last… [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty, Margaret Drew at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (in three posts), and Angus Johnston at Student Activism. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:01 am
” With commentary at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger disputes Erwin Chemerinsky’s inclusion (in an article for the ABA Journal) of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule among the areas in which Justice Anthony Kennedy “was the fifth vote for a liberal result, and where it is uncertain, or even unlikely, that Kavanaugh would decide the same way. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the U.S. government’s request to the Supreme Court for a stay of a Hawaii district court ruling blocking enforcement of key portions of the president’s September 24 ban. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who maintains that “any genuine originalist will swiftly be declared ‘out of the mainstream’ by Senator Schumer, the New York Times, and the usual suspects. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Tuesday’s opinion in Fernandez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes Justice Stevens’ role in a number of death penalty cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the output from Friday’s conference. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Kimberly Bennett summarizes the Woodall decision at JURIST, while at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger praises the Court’s opinion, writing that “[f]ederal habeas remains a safety net in case the state courts completely fail to do their jobs and are clearly wrong, but in all debatable questions the state court decision stands. [read post]
