Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 441 - 460
of 624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
I covered the argument for this blog; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” And Kent Scheidegger discusses the issues in the case in a podcast for the Federalist Society. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Scheidegger [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes Justice Stevens’ role in a number of death penalty cases. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his take on the U.S. government’s request to the Supreme Court for a stay of a Hawaii district court ruling blocking enforcement of key portions of the president’s September 24 ban. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on a study by Richard Hasen which concludes that Justice Antonin Scalia is the Court’s most sarcastic Justice; other coverage of and commentary on the study come from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Hasen himself at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:45 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has compiled the 20 amicus briefs urging the court to review City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
"This means further delay in an execution that is already very long overdue," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Orin Kerr has this initial post and these thoughts on the Court's new habeas exception at Volokh Conspiracy; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes issue with the dissents from the decision to deny the stay by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor here and here, respectively. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger argues that the Court should “stop carving out individual good-faith ‘exceptions’ to an overall rule of suppression of evidence and instead make ‘bad faith’ a required element of a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on Justice Ginsburg’s statement concurring in the Court’s denial in Hittson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
" At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surmises that Justice Sotomayor, as evidenced by her questions in Tuesday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger suggests that the statute’s requirement that the body armor have moved in interstate commerce is a “very tenuous hook” under the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Yesterday, along with Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, I filed an amicus brief for the Van Treese family and the Oklahoma District Attorneys Association. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
’” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger considers Monday’s decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who writes that “[t]his is likely the last provision of the Bill of Rights to be ‘incorporated. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:38 am
Despite having the nation's largest population of condemned prisoners, there has not been an execution in the state since convicted killer Clarence Allen was put to death in January 2006.At least six death row inmates have exhausted all appeals and could be scheduled for execution as soon as the legal reviews are completed, said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation that supports the resumption of executions.Terry Thornton, spokeswoman for the California… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the majority opinion comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who writes that it contains “the strongest statement of the unquestionable constitutionality of capital punishment that I have ever seen in an opinion of the Court. [read post]
