Search for: "King v. People" Results 441 - 460 of 2,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2007, 10:12 am
But it is a question best left to the people and to their elected representatives in the legislature. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:19 am by Nassiri Law
One of the things his attorney wanted people to understand is that racism and racial discrimination in the employment setting can happen anywhere – “even in black-owned businesses. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A clash between culture and law: A comparative look at the conflict between quiet title actions in Hawaii, the Kuleana Act of 1850, and the displacement of Indigenous people. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
He describes how the firm brought in lots of business-side people, including a CFO, a COO, and marketing and public relations people. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:42 pm
King King argues that imposition of consecutive sentences by the judge was improper. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  As the Court has shown us time and again in its immunity jurisprudence, the government can do no wrong, because the government -- like the King -- is sovereign. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We sometimes wonder how people agree to unusual methods of accomplishing very ordinary tasks. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
—The King & I The post Baby Ninth Amendments Part V: Real Life, Potpourri, and the Big Picture appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]