Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON"
Results 441 - 460
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 8:32 am
The Court of Appeals does not see it that way.The case is Outlaw v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 9:48 am
The Texas House Appropriations Committee yesterday adopted recommendations (pdf) from its subcommittee on Article V of the budget, which covers Public Safety and Criminal Justice. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees, killing off the habeas petition.The case is Waiters v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 6:51 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals (Carney, Livingston and Pooler) says "an informational disclosure law . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
"The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Lynch and Sullivan) reverses and reinstates the verdict. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
"Citing its decision in Livingston v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
The Court of Appeals affirms the verdict.The case is Mulholland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:38 am
The case is McMillan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:40 am
She got one, and she got convicted.The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 6:51 am
The case is King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:52 am
But the Court of Appeals (Raggi, Winter and Livingston) is hesitant to reject this argument entirely. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:34 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Kearse and Carney) upholds the search. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:05 am
The Second Circuit says the plaintiff has a case.The case is Safepath Systems, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:03 am
The Court reasons that the religious accommodation provisions are probably unconstititionalThe case is Kane v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:19 am
The district court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, but the Court of Appeals reverses and returns the case to the district court to reconsider the case.The case is Williamson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:34 am
The Second Circuit revives a case filed by a Jewish organization in Connecticut that wanted to expand its building.The case is Chabad Lubavich v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:34 am
This exception allows us to honor the rule that qualified immunity should be resolved as early in the case as possible, even if that means you can appeal the denial of such immunity before the parties even start discovery.The case is Shakir v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:03 am
The Court of Appeals says there is no case.The case is Basinski v. [read post]
