Search for: "LOWE v. US " Results 441 - 460 of 11,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
A week in which we didn’t take “a pinch of salt”  with the news as it didn’t “suit us to a tea”… … as we (and the Cabinet Office) thought the US Embassy was playing games with us. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
In this case, Catherine McAndrew, a Senior Associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in TUI Limited v Griffiths [2023] UKSC 48I, which was handed down on 29 November 2023. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and… [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:56 am by Chris Castle
 The simple answer is the same reason monopolists always use: they need living space for Greater Spotify. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  Among the drugs with accepted medical uses, those in schedule II have the greatest potential for abuse and those in schedule V the least. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
” In that regard, the guidelines note, e.g., switching costs and search frictions that, of course, may be high or low and may impose costs on employers as well as employees. [read post]