Search for: "Lacking v. State of Mississippi" Results 441 - 460 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Air Force The Scrubbed Scrubs Award: Ontario Ministry of Health, Canada The Judicial Blindfold Award: Mississippi Justice Courts It’s My Party and I Can Hide Records If I Want to Award: Wyoming Department of Education The Fee-l the Burn Award: Baltimore Police Department The Continuing Failure Award: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services The Creative Invoicing Award: Richmond, Va., Police Department The Not-So-Magic Word Award: Augusta County Sheriff’s… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Mississippi Dept. of Transportation, 942 So.2d 136, 143 (Miss. 2006); Lugtu v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, involving a similar Mississippi law, has been sent back to the waiting room. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The US had submitted a brief, I believe, for restructuring Mississippi higher eduction according to the principle of Green v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Courthouse News says "Underscoring the bizarre nature of the proceedings, no attorneys for Equustek Solutions or the Canadian court system showed up, allowing Caruso to state her case to U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Mississippi, employing a factor-based approach that has been embraced by some courts but rejected by most others, was unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parents contended in both appeals that Family Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because New Mexico was the home state of the children, the neglect took place in New Mexico, and the parents were neither domiciliaries of nor otherwise significantly connected to New York State. [read post]