Search for: "Lemon v. Lemon" Results 441 - 460 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 7:48 am by Jim Gerl
Here is a list: DL v Dist of Columbia 61 IDELR 2, 713 F.3d 120 (DC Cir 4/12/13); Petities by Martin v District of Columbia 55 IDELR 271, 662 F.3d 564 (DC Cir 12/2/11);  Blackman v District of Columbia 46 IDELR 31, 456 F.3d 167 (DC Cir 7/12/06); Lesesne ex rel BF v District of Columbia 45 IDELR 208, 447 F.3d 828 (DC Cir 5/19/06); Whatley &; Williams ex rel Whatley v District of Columbia 45 IDELR… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
” The court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
To have that repudiate private-choice precedent set in Lemon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
James reminded us of Toth v Emirates [2012] EWHC 517 (Ch), which limited the scope for taking Nominet decisions before the courts for a judicial review [on which see brief Katnote here].Turning to passing off, the Advocaat, Jif Lemon, Henry vacuum cleaner, Moroccanoil, Swiss chocolate, the FAGE/Chobani Greek yoghurt and Vodkat decisions were also subjected to James' analysis. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPA controverted the claim but ultimately  the Court of Appeals affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board's determination that Neacosia suffered an injury that arose “out of and in the course of [his] employment" because the security officer used one of the facilities with which NYPA had made arrangements to do the cleaning and bill NYPA for the cleaning services it provided to the security officer.* The Appellate Division cited Lemon v New York City Tr. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPA controverted the claim but ultimately  the Court of Appeals affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board's determination that Neacosia suffered an injury that arose “out of and in the course of [his] employment" because the security officer used one of the facilities with which NYPA had made arrangements to do the cleaning and bill NYPA for the cleaning services it provided to the security officer.* The Appellate Division cited Lemon v New York City Tr. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Denturist Association 2014 FC 989 http://t.co/LHpgGeD81X -> Overdue legislative action threatens existence of made-in-Alberta privacy laws http://t.co/Z4TKKX09mA -> WIPO Director General Talks on Innovation at Geneva Event http://t.co/v9N3nTm9nC -> More Misleading Hype about the IP Chapter of the TPP: Forbes' Katheryn Thayer http://t.co/plCrUzOTTm -> No Lemonade For Aereo’s Lemons http://t.co/317SMDqFo5 -> How Spooky Is It? [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
In a huge win for consumers in New Jersey and throughout the United States, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided today in the case of Real v. [read post]