Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 82,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is like a typical jurisdictional analysis involving an out-of-state defendant, except the analysis involves the United States as a whole instead of looking at whether the defendant’s act target a certain state. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
It considers how the state immunity revolution came to an end, continuing threats to the Seminole Tribe paradigm posed by recent decisions like Torres v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
The court makes it sound like Facebook didn’t prepare the case well, but more likely, the court is shifting goalposts. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Although this sounds like a complicated lawyer term, people who have lived in states like Florida or Pennsylvania may be familiar with it. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:16 am by MICHAEL H. ERDMAN
NAR.Discovery closes in a few months (November 21), and NAR's counsel stated that his client would "quite likely" be filing a motion for summary judgment thereafter. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Heidi Kitrosser
The state’s attorney dismissed both charges. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Relying on its state constitution, the Iowa Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am by Derek T. Muller
And while states might not be able to interfere with certain federal functions, the Court understood the precedent of cases like Ray v. [read post]