Search for: "Long v. California"
Results 441 - 460
of 10,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
Frankly, the point that a decertification motion is not a "do-over" was a point long overdue. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
Perhaps she will surprise us, however, and finally have a long-overdue trial for the Unanski v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Low-wage jobs are California’s Achilles’ heel, May 20, 2015, The Berkeley Blog More Blog Entries: Adams v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 9:20 am
A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Camp v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:04 am
California law has long prohibited harassment and discrimination based on national origin. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 7:43 am
District Court for the Central District of California entitled McGuire v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:34 pm
As many of you know, on July 25, 2008, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District issued its long-awaited decision in the Brinker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am
Soto v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 8:39 am
Employment laws are constantly changing, so we suggest you contact us for updated information.Yesterday the California Supreme Court heard arguments in Ross v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am
NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
From Judge Dale Drozd's opinion in Clifton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
App. 4th 174, and Fitz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
”’” (Long v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:26 am
Riley v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:40 am
In Huff v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
In its long-anticipated decision in Brinker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
We have recently added New Jersey law to the app, as well as updated it to reflect changes in California law following the long awaited Brinker v. [read post]
