Search for: "Long v. Frank"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 4:36 pm
The right to have personal information and data deleted from a website, so long as its removal does not interfere with others’ right to free expression, was most recently confirmed by the CJEU in the Google v CNIL case. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:50 pm
Supreme Court in Berger v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:24 am
The head of the Workers’ Compensation Department, Frank Petro, has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials (the A/V rating is only for lawyers considered the top in their field). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
Frank O. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 12:55 pm
Williamson & Brown,v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
§5491(c)(3) be severed from the Dodd-Frank Act? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:56 pm
Finally, in Lomax v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan, New York Times v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Long Island R.R. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
Frank Bowman is the Floyd R. [read post]
New plot twist: CFPB agrees its structure is unconstitutional; Ballard Spahr to hold Oct. 22 webinar
19 Sep 2019, 10:36 am
The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in March 2019 and last week directed the parties to file letter briefs regarding what action the Fifth Circuit panel should take in light of the en banc Fifth Circuit’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
New Mexico, though, just rejected that rule a couple of weeks ago (in State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
If so, why wait so long? [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In explaining its reversal of long-standing precedent, the Seventh Circuit noted that the Supreme Court had evolved its understanding of implied remedies in recent decisions, most notably Meghrig v. [read post]
