Search for: "M. v. United States of America" Results 441 - 460 of 1,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, noting that Gundy is “a decidedly unlikely emissary in conservatives’ campaign to dismantle the administrative state. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
For all of the reasons discussed here, here, and here, STL has not been a fan of the United States Olympic Committee’s efforts to enforce its near monopoly rights in the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
Instead, he need only say, ‘The United States changed its mind. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
13 Ways of Looking at Dred ScottJack M. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Because this is a federal decision, it will hold significant precedential weight in similar cases filed throughout the United States in the future. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
United States 15-5991Issue: Whether, in the bank-fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:17 am by Eugene Volokh
-based Center for Renewing America, and served as expert witness for the State of Texas in NetChoice v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
In 1882, the United States passed the nakedly racist Chinese Exclusion Act; a year later, construction of the base of the statue began with Chinese laborers among the workforce. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]