Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Deeper Dive Obergefell, Bob Jones, and the IRS (Marcus S. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 1:48 pm
”); Saxe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
.), Joke Bodewits (Amsterdam), Gonzalo Gállego (Madrid), Marcus Schreibauer (Düsseldorf), Stefan Schuppert (Munich), Tim Wybitul (Frankfurt) and Eduardo Ustaran (London). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:36 pm
[Update: here are some photos from the traveling docket.]March 30--Thursday--p.m.State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:14 am
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:30 am
Marcus V. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
But in Marcus v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
But in Marcus v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:03 am
The case is styled, Marcus Richard, et al v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 7:23 am
Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc. and Quillian v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
You can't just "average" the competing results.What the trial court did just seems crazy.So I'm totally with the Court of Appeal on that.But there's one part of the opinion I'm less sure about.The Court of Appeals notes that "The Marcus and Forsyth appraisals discounted the fair value of appellants' shareholder interest by 20 percent and 15 percent for lack of control. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Marcus, Out of Breath and Down to the Wire: A Call for Constitution-Focused Police Reform, 59 Howard L. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Vickers v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Vickers v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:45 am
In analyzing the plaintiffs’ Article III standing, the court relied on Remijas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
Image by Marcus Hansson. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:28 pm
See Pet. for Review 22 (copy of Court of Appeal opinion) (“Yelp’s factual position in this case is unlike that of the . . . appellants [in Marcus v. [read post]
