Search for: "MARRIAGE OF A R C"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 3:47 am
C. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:27 am
¡Coño, qué rápida! [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:54 pm
C., March 6, 2017, J.M. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:29 am
Indeed, one plaintiff was advised that his marriage petition was approved and his wife’s visa application is pending. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:24 am
Johannes C. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Nonetheless, the court found the sexual orientation discrimination cases “illuminating because they underscore that ‘[c]onduct and status are often inextricably linked. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
Better a kabuki dance set to the anodyne music of platitudes than Trump’s theatre of the absurd.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:25 am
“C’mon . . . it was just a JOKE! [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
R. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
R. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
”Dissenting from the Supreme Court’s decision finding a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Chief Justice Roberts expressed a similar worry to the one that animated the Brown II Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
United States (Bruce R. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
C. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Senators and commentators have long debated whether ideology is a legitimate criterion for voting against the confirmation of a professionally qualified nominee, with no consensus emerging.On one hand, presidents very clearly consider ideology in choosing whom to nominate, thereby suggesting that Senators in choosing whether to “consent” to a nomination should likewise be able to make their judgments on that ground.On the other hand, given polarization on the most consequential issues… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Defendants open their Objections to Judge Coffin’s F & R by stating that “[c]limate change poses a monumental threat to Americans’ health and welfare by driving long-lasting changes in our climate, leading to an array of severe negative effects, which will worsen over time. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
In any public place. 138 c. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
In any public place. 138 c. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
R. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:21 am
Suppose one of the parties in a similar situation elects not to proceed with the marriage? [read post]
