Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE"
Results 441 - 460
of 899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
’" Here, the court invokes Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:22 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:12 am
Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief by Lawrence Wright (2013) [cd, unabridged]11. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:40 am
Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief by Lawrence Wright (2013) [cd, unabridged]11. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Jaycees and Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
There is a more recent, more powerful shadow: the shadow of Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:17 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence removed the only ground—moral disapproval—on which the State could have at one time relied to distinguish the rights of gay and lesbian individuals from the rights of heterosexual individuals.Moving to plaintiffs' equal protection challenge, the court held that none of the reasons put forward to justify the ban-- responsible procreation, optimal child rearing, proceeding with caution, preserving the traditional definition of… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:29 pm
Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 601 (Scalia, J., dissenting).Inasmuch as Justice Scalia has never "recommended" that lower federal courts strike down state marriage laws, Judge Shelby's "agreement" with Scalia is nothing of the kind. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:03 pm
* A federal judge just struck down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
(Given Lawrence, states can’t ban homosexual sex, but before Lawrence most states didn’t either.) [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:30 pm
Notably absent from the Court's analysis was any citation to the United States vs Windsor same-sex marriage decision. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:41 pm
Judge Waddoups drew some inspiration for his ruling from the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
The Court finds a 14th Amendment Due Process violation here, based on a application of Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:30 pm
The phrase also violates Due Process under Lawrence because it violates the principle of “consensual sexual privacy,” and that it is also void for vagueness. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm
With unimaginable speed, this landmark Lawrence decision paved the way for marriage victories in the courts and in state legislatures that the ACLU has celebrated and been a part of in recent years. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]
