Search for: "MATTER OF K B" Results 441 - 460 of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2011, 7:28 pm by Michael Webster
 We can now draw a diagram, with k on the X axis, and the Y axis reflecting the payoffs of B and R, given k people have chosen already to play B. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There is no definition of a degree of narrowness required from the part to be excluded in order to be the potential subject-matter of a disclaimer. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, on the basis of the results shown in the Example of the application as filed, not all possible marker combinations within the above identified group B) can be seen as being directly and unambiguously interchangeable in the method of that Example […]. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:18 pm by PaulKostro
See N.J.R.E. 602 (providing that fact “witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter”). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
  Such a letter could move the matter toward a resolution which may be more tailored to what the family wants. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Attorneys at BSF and B&K purportedly billed for reviewing the same documents (id., ,187). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(b) The mist generator comprises a mist channelling funnel (Nebelkanaltrichter), and the water level sensor is provided at the height of the bottom edge of the mist channelling funnel(c) The water reservoir comprises a water overflow pipe (Wasserüberlauf) at the height of the water level sensor.As the present main request corresponds to t [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In a footnote the Court pointed out that to the extent that the parties' separation agreement defined emancipation as, among other things, a "child establishing a permanent residence away from his or her custodial parent," it noted that "the parties cannot contract away the duty of child support" (Matter of Thomas B. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The patent in suit refers in general to routine experimentation for the determination of the multiplication factors and the factor B without providing any information as to how the experimentation should be performed. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
For the same reasons, it is not possible to consider that an improvement of the smoothing (lissage) that is obtained by replacing cocoamidopropyl betaine and disodium cocoamphodiacetate by cocoylbetaine within the particular context of compositions B and C tested in document D14 would also have to be observed when the same substitution is made within the different context of example 11 of document D4, which is the closest prior art. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
The Board considers instead relevant in the present case the established Case Law that, when the technical problem is simply that of providing a further composition of matter or a further method, i.e. simply that of providing an alternative to the prior art, any feature or combination of features already conventional for that sort of composition of matter or method represents an equally suggested or obvious solution to the posed problem. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
The reason to vote for B/B/B/K is that Bernie must be stopped in order to stop Trump. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Given these circumstances, it was prima facie plausible that in view of the comparative example in document D3 the above technical problem was solved by the addition of an organic phosphonate (component b)). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
An application filed in this way shall have the same effect as if it had been filed on the same date at the EPO.(2) …(3) No Contracting State may provide for or allow the filing of European divisional applications with an authority referred to in paragraph (1)(b).Pursuant to A 75(3) EPC 1973 divisional applications must be filed at the EPO. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The test for deciding whether an amendment contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed is whether the skilled person would be presented with information which is not directly and unambiguously derivable from what was presented by the application as filed, even when account is taken of matter which is implicit to a person skilled in the art (Guidelines C VI-5.3.1, December 2007). [2.2.2] The objected feature specifies that when the first rotor… [read post]