Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 441 - 460
of 53,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In principle, the parties should be informed on the new objections in writing, as soon as possible (T 433/93; T 1164/00; T 64/03).[1.3] In the present case the Board notes that the late submission and the admission of the new ground for opposition into the proceedings have not been mentioned in writing or orally. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:09 pm
I wouldn’t vote for either one. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
It was indicated in the Board’s communication that the homogenised mixture of Cyclomethicone DC 245, Finsolv® TN and Thixcin R that was contained in the compositions of Examples 6 and 7 of D18 was implicitly a moisturising cream providing occlusive properties within the meaning of the patent in suit, since Thixcin R was a known occlusive agent. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The same applies to the interpretation of the Implementing Regulations on the Grant of European Patents and the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal, as they are part of the EPC (A 164(1)) or have their basis in the Implementing Regulations (R 12(3)). [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:07 pm
Cartoon short producer Marlin "Ren" T. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
CONGRESSIONAL PORK APOLOGISTS TELL US THAT EARMARKS DON’T MATTER BECAUSE THEY’RE A TINY FRACTION OF THE BUDGET: So why all the excitement about those AIG bonuses that represent only a tiny fraction of the bailout money? [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:20 am
No matter how serious your work is, there’s always room for Jello. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:11 am
Buried, as a matter a fact. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
G 1/93 [headnote 2] indicates a last possible way out:“A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the application as filed, is not to… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Admissibility of the appeal (A 108 and R 99).[1.1] The appellant proprietor argued that the appeal by the appellant opponent was inadmissible, since the notice and the statement of grounds of appeal were filed on a letterhead of Saint-Gobain Recherche and merely indicated “par la présente nous formons un recours” (“hereby we file an appeal”) and “notre mémoire de recours” (“our statement of grounds of appeal”), respectively… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 2:46 am
On a motion for summary judgment, the court ruled (download ruling as pdf) that a few of the shirts presented a likelihood of confusion with the licensed shirts as a matter of law, based on the color of the shirts, the font type, and the use of terms such as "KU" or "Kansas. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:38 pm
§ 101 (see Memorandum entitled "Recent Subject Matter Eligibility Decisions"). [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:55 am
District Judge Henry Kennedy Jr. won't be prying into the CIA's destruction of interrogation tapes in 2005. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:40 am
However, the following documents were considered as proof of the common general knowledge and admitted into the proceedings:D11: Dubbel "Taschenbuch für den Maschinenbau" 18. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
It does matter practically, but shouldn't. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 4:31 am
It may seem like a small matter. but respect is something that is earned. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:31 am
Should Counsel wish to discuss the matter further, he should contact Nearly Legal of Instructing Solicitors, who is dandling a dry Martini and wearing a cravat. job, whatever [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:31 am
Should Counsel wish to discuss the matter further, he should contact Nearly Legal of Instructing Solicitors, who is dandling a dry Martini and wearing a cravat. job, whatever [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:38 am
The Boards of Appeal in both cases rejected this argument, finding that "[o]nly the claims determine the extent of protection" (T 1473/19, r. 3.16).Squaring the circle of claim interpretation (T 0169/20)T 0169/20 directly addresses the issue of claim interpretation. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:08 pm
Don't miss the next issue. [read post]
