Search for: "MCCOY v. MCCOY."
Results 441 - 460
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
McCoy, Dkt. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 5:09 am
Much as this may make advocates sad, Lave’s premise, based on Chancellor Carol McCoy’s decision in Mock v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
This term’s decision in Jennings was already cited in Alito’s dissent in McCoy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:46 am
Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
“This doctrine applies where there is continuing trust and confidence in the relationship between the parties and the attorney’s continuing representation pertains to the specific matter in which the attorney committed the [*3]alleged malpractice, not merely the continuity of a general professional relationship” (Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d 948, 950 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am
In opposition, plaintiffs argue that the continuous representation doctrine applies to· Todtman Nachamie (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
McCoy, et al., 09-329. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Cir. 1959) and Home Box Office v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
See State v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
Virginia, McCoy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Calvao v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 6:04 pm
Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
See McCoy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:07 am
McCoy, 378 Ill. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:39 am
McCoy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 8:40 am
EPA is calling the proposed rule the "Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule. [read post]
