Search for: "MET-PRO CORPORATION" Results 441 - 460 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 12:23 pm by LindaMBeale
  They disregard the facts All of the complexities of the income tax remain for both the income tax and the Flat Tax--what is income, what character is the income, when is it income, is an item deductible or not (charitable contributions can really be quid pro quos, etc.). [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:46 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
” Once again, this is not about replacing lawyers with robots, or encouraging Pro Se litigants to not seek legal assistance. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:00 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Links to Items Discussed: Law.com Radar Legal Compass Global Leaders in Law Corporate Counsel Advance LegalWeek Crystal Ball Answer This week’s Crystal Ball answer comes to us from Ken Crutchfield of Wolters Kluwer. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Matt Gaetz repeatedly boasted to people involved in Florida politics about women he met through a county tax collector who has since been charged by federal authorities with sex trafficking of a minor, according to two people who heard his comments directly. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:29 am by Jordan Furlong
All the arguments up to this point, pro and con, have been theoretical. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
At the same time, they are actively lobbying the city on behalf of corporate clients. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 12:52 pm by Arianna Morseau
Alaska Legal Services Corporation Native Law Staff Attorney. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:28 am by bcuban
I first met Steven Dunn through my eating disorder advocacy. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Kagan had accused Genn of groping her when they met on March 1. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Adrian M. Baron
 Deadlines needed to be met and court appearances had to be made. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
§ 101(31): The term “insider” includes — (A) if the debtor is an individual— (i) relative of the debtor or of a general partner of the debtor; (ii) partnership in which the debtor is a general partner; (iii) general partner of the debtor; or (iv) corporation of which the debtor is a director, officer, or person in control; (B) if the debtor is a corporation— (i) director of the debtor; (ii) officer of the debtor; (iii) person in control of the… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
Some of our editors had never met personally before, and all of those present could exchange views and news on PIL as well as on the blog. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:28 am
" The courts will eventually move to electronic filing, just as the land registry offices and corporate filing offices already have. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”The punishment for violating the Fact Act is a civil penalty of $500 for a first offense and $1000 for each subsequent offense.Legal Challenges to the FACT ActThis case involves three different religiously-affiliated non-profit corporations who challenged the mandatory disclosures required by the FACT Act on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:05 am by Maria J. Stephan
Each major attempt to advance multi-racial democracy in the United States, whether through Reconstruction, the civil rights movement, or the election of Barack Obama and the modern-day Movement for Black Lives coalition, has been met with violent authoritarian backlash. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:12 am by Richard Burt
So a sale of, say, one-third of a seller’s inventory would not be a bulk sale, even if the other criteria for a bulk sale are met. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:12 am by Richard Burt
So a sale of, say, one-third of a seller’s inventory would not be a bulk sale, even if the other criteria for a bulk sale are met. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Here, the Supreme Court failed to conduct the requisite inquiry before allowing the defendant to proceed pro se with regard to the hearing and determination of the defendant’s motions to modify and/or vacate the custody order. [read post]