Search for: "MOORE v. MOORE" Results 441 - 460 of 5,215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm by Rick Hasen
With news today that the Supreme Court cancelled oral argument in the Title 42 case on immigration after the Biden DOJ informed the Court that the Title 42 policy will end in a few months with the end of the… Continue reading The post Why Haven’t the Parties in Moore v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm by Shams Hirji
  Judge White wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court, which was joined by Judge Moore and Judge Bush. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:09 am by Rick Hasen
That gives plenty of time for the North Carolina Supreme Court to do what I expect, which is to reverse the earlier holding that partisan gerrymandering violates the North Carolina constitution, before the Supreme Court… Continue reading The post North Carolina Supreme Court Schedules March 14 Oral Argument in Rehearing in Harper, the Partisan Gerrymandering Case that Could Moot Moore v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
There is a new twist in Moore v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:18 am by Rick Hasen
Its crucial word, generating the challenge in Moore v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:54 am by Joe Patrice
[Reuters] * Professor Rick Hasen discusses the high likelihood that Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:22 pm by Rick Hasen
Back on November 9, I wrote: Could the Flipping of the North Carolina Supreme Court to Republican Control Moot the Moore v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:02 pm by Tom Smith
Circuit Court of Appeals upholding a form of wealth tax could upend that conventional wisdom if it is allowed to stand.The case, Moore v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Appellate Division, First Department courthouse in Manhattan (Photo by David Handschuh/NYLJ) “Plaintiff [Kirby] alleges that she is a member of a protected class; that she was qualified for the position by, among other things, having a decade of experience in leadership roles; and that she was subject to an adverse employment action under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination,” the panel wrote, citing Moore v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp., 50 AD3d… [read post]