Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 4,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright IPKat has published Part 1 of its deep-dive into brand protection in the Metaverse, following the explosion of brands taking advantage of the increased consumer engagement in the virtual realm. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984) (requiring that a facially content-neutral ban on camping must be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech"); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:45 am by SCOTUStalk
(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Listen now on Acast. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
C. v Fink, Weinberger, Fredman, Berman & Lowell, P. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The music artist Four Tet is suing his record label Domino Recording Company for breach of contract in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
The first two authorities, Nichols v Amalgamated Press (1908) Macg Cop Cas (1905-10) 2 166 and Schroeder Music Publishing v Macaulay [1974] 1 WLR 1308 (HL), involved music publishing contracts where the copyright assigned was in a musical composition, depriving the creator of the ability to benefit economically from their creation for the term of the copyright. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
T-1256-21 Jan 31, 2022 (FC) at para 9. [2] See Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm by Holly Brezee
  Spotify also asserted that there was no reason for Ek to testify personally when there were numerous other executives at Spotify who could testify as to Spotify’s approach to licensing when expanding into the United States. [read post]